|
|
本帖最后由 Reader86 于 2025-7-31 09:07 AM 编辑
Aestheticism and the idea of “art for art’s sake” are deeply interconnected—essentially, “art for art’s sake” is the core philosophy of aestheticism. Here’s how they relate and reinforce each other:
⸻
???? What is Aestheticism?
Aestheticism was a 19th-century artistic and literary movement (especially in Britain and France) that emphasized:
• Beauty over morality
• Form over function
• Sensory experience over narrative meaning
It emerged as a reaction against Victorian utilitarianism and moralistic art, arguing that art should exist independently of social, political, or moral agendas.
⸻
????️ “Art for Art’s Sake” — The Motto
• French origin: L’art pour l’art
• Popularized by writers like Théophile Gautier, and later embraced by figures like Oscar Wilde, James McNeill Whistler, and Walter Pater.
It asserts:
Art doesn’t need a purpose outside itself.
It doesn’t have to teach, preach, or serve politics or religion.
⸻
Relationship Between the Two:
Aestheticism
“Art for Art’s Sake”
A broader movement in art & literature
A slogan or guiding principle
Focuses on beauty, form, and style
Asserts art’s autonomy from morality or utility
Promoted by artists, writers, and critics
Serves as its central philosophy
Seen in the works of Wilde, Pater, Whistler
Literally expressed in essays and manifestos |
|