最親密的戰友（長篇小說）

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-19 14:55:46

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-8-22 10:49 AM 编辑

章興國著

繁體中文版：《最亲密的战友》

简体中文版：《最亲密的战友》

歡迎讀者下載上面兩個鏈接裡的 pdf 文件。歡迎讀者向朋友推薦這個網頁，或贈送 pdf 文件。

2011-08-19

拙林 · 发表于 2011-8-19 15:07:02

出版了？恭喜！

（上面简体版的链接不work）

漫人 · 发表于 2011-8-19 15:08:02

多情菜籽发表于 2011-8-19 03:55 PM
章興國著

繁體中文版：《最亲密的战友》

何塞写小说啦？

什么时候步入文学青年的行列的？祝贺祝贺！

不管怎么说，先顶一回！

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-19 15:53:06

回复拙林的帖子

The link problem is fixed. Try again.

昨夜雨 · 发表于 2011-8-19 15:53:56

回复拙林的帖子

好像修复了。

祝贺！

fancao · 发表于 2011-8-21 23:59:37

恭喜！

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-22 00:00:21

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-8-21 09:04 PM 编辑

回复漫人的帖子

读了没有？心情不好的时候，读了可以提神。

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-22 00:03:23

回复拙林的帖子

现在是自己出版，游击广告。写一篇评论吧？

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-22 00:06:01

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-8-21 09:07 PM 编辑

回复 fancao 的帖子

缘何？

fancao · 发表于 2011-8-22 09:17:58

回复多情菜籽的帖子

哦，出版了呀。

漫人 · 发表于 2011-8-22 12:36:33

回复多情菜籽的帖子

还没来得及看哈，最近有点忙，忙得连心情不好的时间都不多。

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-22 13:48:09

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-8-22 10:52 AM 编辑

回复 fancao 的帖子

一年以前找过。没有找到出版社。
我希望喜欢这个小说的人把小说介绍给大陆的同胞。下面有四个链接：

繁體中文 pdf 版（長度：944KB）：《最親密的戰友》

简体中文 pdf 版（長度：900KB）：《最亲密的战友》

繁體中文 doc 版（長度：240KB）：《最親密的戰友》

简体中文 doc 版（長度：242KB）：《最亲密的战友》

歡迎讀者下載上面四個鏈接裡的文件。歡迎讀者向朋友推薦這個網頁，或贈送 pdf 或 doc 文件。

2011-08-22

fancao · 发表于 2011-8-22 15:30:17

回复多情菜籽的帖子

All links failed.

Not Found
The requested URL /"http://zhangxg.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/tmicia110818t.pdf" was not found on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.17 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_fcgid/2.3.6 Phusion_Passenger/2.2.15 mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_bwlimited/1.4 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 Server at www.smallstation.net Port 80

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-22 17:43:36

請直接把下面的鏈接放進 browser 的 URL input box 裡：
http://zhangxg.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/tmicia/

Ningna · 发表于 2011-8-24 23:47:35

匆匆读了几大段，好像比上次见到有意思多了。加油！

panda · 发表于 2011-8-25 01:41:33

本帖最后由 panda 于 2011-8-25 02:43 AM 编辑

i finished the whole thing in 3 hours, more like a movie script than a novel. language seems pretty nature, but everything else does not. :)

nj89 · 发表于 2011-8-25 08:48:03

不错，没出版没关系啊，就当网络作家吧。

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-25 11:55:42

panda 发表于 2011-8-24 10:41 PM
i finished the whole thing in 3 hours, more like a movie script than a novel. language seems pretty ...

thanks for commenting!
did you mean the dialog was natural, but everything else is not natural?

panda · 发表于 2011-8-25 14:17:27

多情菜籽发表于 2011-8-25 12:55 PM
thanks for commenting!
did you mean the dialog was natural, but everything else is not natural?

Right,story kind of fake

panda · 发表于 2011-8-25 14:17:55

多情菜籽发表于 2011-8-25 12:55 PM
thanks for commenting!
did you mean the dialog was natural, but everything else is not natural?

Right,story kind of fake.

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-25 20:10:45

panda 发表于 2011-8-25 11:17 AM
Right,story kind of fake.

I wrote a novel. The story about 何仁义，林剑寒 are not real. The story of 潘景寅，叶群，林立果 in that airplane is made up as well.
The questions then become:
1. Do you think 何仁义，林剑寒 's have the right to dig up evidences in Lin Biao's case?
2. Do you think 何仁义，林剑寒 used the right method in achieving their goal?
3. Although there is a distance between my story and today's reality, do you think the events described in the novel could become reality in the future?

panda · 发表于 2011-8-26 01:01:43

回复多情菜籽的帖子

>1. Do you think 何仁义，林剑寒 's have the right to dig up evidences in Lin Biao's case?

yes , sure

>2. Do you think 何仁义，林剑寒 used the right method in achieving their goal?

maybe not. :)

>3. Although there is a distance between my story and today's reality, do you think the events described in the novel could become reality in the future?

i am not sure what you asking here. is this a trick question?

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-26 10:44:51

panda 发表于 2011-8-25 10:01 PM
回复多情菜籽的帖子

My novel created a "new reality".
1. Do you like the "new reality"?
2. Do you want to see the "new reality" become reality in future?
3. Do you think the "new reality" will become reality in future?

panda · 发表于 2011-8-26 12:39:35

多情菜籽发表于 2011-8-26 11:44 AM
My novel created a "new reality".
1. Do you like the "new reality"?
2. Do you want to see the "n ...

I think you created fiction, not "new reality". I don't want to see u got shot in the future, but I do like to see more truth when it is availble.:)
Cheers

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-26 14:12:19

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-8-26 11:33 AM 编辑

panda 发表于 2011-8-26 09:39 AM
I think you created fiction, not "new reality". I don't want to see u got shot in the future, but ...

When we step into a movie theater, we want to see something extraordinary, something we don't see in daily life. We are willing to pay to get entertained. That is exactly what my novel intends to provide: something extraodinary, spectacular, and emotionally rewarding.

Did you feel you saw something extraordinary, spectacular, and emotionally rewarding after reading my novel?

panda · 发表于 2011-8-26 14:59:36

多情菜籽发表于 2011-8-26 03:12 PM
When we step into a movie theater, we want to see something extraordinary, something we don't see ...

Some thing unusual, but I would not say spectacle or especially rewarding.
Like I said, the dialogue is quiet good, but story too fake, not believable, so you may want to think about that.

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-8-26 15:42:27

panda 发表于 2011-8-26 11:59 AM
Some thing unusual, but I would not say spectacle or especially rewarding.
Like I said, the dialog ...

I thought it was possible. Now I know it is a very long shot.

Thanks for your comment!

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-9-7 00:38:16

我写了一大篇小说。看起来冒了很大的风险。其实，我是有支撑的。
虽然我的关于专机里最后三分钟的故事是编出来的。但是故事的骨架是基于下面的结论的：

1. 林立衡女士的交代材料里说的很清楚了。中央警卫团的人故意轰赶叶群，林立果，林彪上飞机。他们还轰赶林立衡女士一起去。林立衡女士没去。

2. 没有上级的命令，潘景寅不可能撇下两个副驾驶，一个领航员，一个通讯员，自己一个人把飞机开上天。他肯定接受了特殊任务。

3. 林立衡女士在九月七日便把林立果去香港的计划告诉了刘吉纯，李文普。刘吉纯和李文普肯定往上汇报。谁也不敢耽误，肯定汇报到毛那里。毛做了什么决定，就只有大家猜了。林立衡女士的交代材料里，其实已经隐含了这个意思，但是她没有把她的疑问直接的写出来。

4. 专机坠毁肯定是由埋藏在飞机里的炸弹爆炸引起的。也许是遥控炸弹，也许是定时炸弹。

5. 邓小平有一次会见一位美国人的时候，说潘景寅是“好人”。他似乎随便地说了那么一句话。如果没有机舱录音，没有黑匣子，邓小平如何知道潘景寅是好人？显然潘景寅忠实地执行了特殊任务。所以，邓小平才会说他是“好人”。

6. 周恩来肯定参与了这个谋杀案。他也许是被动的，不知情的。但是他参与了。当有人向周汇报住蒙古使馆得到的资料的时候，周恩来对所有情况都没有兴趣，但是当他听到林彪死了。他的兴趣就来了。在验证林彪之死上，周恩来非常仔细。周身上的血债虽然很多。周对林彪之死还是非常重视的。

对于上面的这些结论，我是十分肯定的。

Reader86 · 发表于 2011-9-12 08:50:02

本帖最后由 Reader86 于 2011-9-12 09:51 AM 编辑

不能不顶。顶！

很好玩的故事， readable !

多情菜籽 · 发表于 2011-9-12 15:04:07

本帖最后由多情菜籽于 2011-9-12 12:06 PM 编辑

Reader86 发表于 2011-9-12 05:50 AM
不能不顶。顶！

很好玩的故事， readable !

很高兴读者MM 喜欢我的故事。

不过我的目标不是“很好玩”。

我的目标是 "The audience wants to be taken to the limit, to where all questions are answered, all emotion satisfied -- the end of the line"

As explained by Robert McKee in his book "Story"：

The PROTAGONIST has the will and capacity to pursue the object of his conscious and/or unconscious desire to the end of the line, to the human limit established by setting and genre.

The art of the story is not about the middle ground, but about the pendulum of existence swinging to the limits, about life lived in its most intense states. We explore the middle ranges of experience, but only as a path to the end of the line. The audience senses that limit and wants it reached. For no matter how intimate or epic the setting, instinctively the audience draws a circle around the characters and their world, a circumference of experience that's defined by the nature of the fictional reality. This line may reach inward to the soul, outward into the universe, or in both directions at once. The audience, therefore, expects the storyteller to be an artist of vision who can take his story to those distant depths and ranges.

A STORY must build to a final action beyond which the audience cannot imagine another.

In other words, a film cannot send its audience to the street rewriting it: "Happy ending ... but shouldn't she have settled things with her father? Shouldn't she have broken up with Ed before she moved in with Mac? Shouldn't she have ..." Or: "Downer ... the guy's dead, but why didn't he call the cops? And didn't he keep a gun under the dash, and shouldn't he have ...?" If people exit imagining scenes they thought they should have seen before or after the ending we give them, they will be less than happy moviegoers. We're supposed to be better writers than they. The audience wants to be taken to the limit, to where all questions are answered, all emotion satisfied -- the end of the line.

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册