|
|
本帖最后由 Reader86 于 2024-10-2 01:02 PM 编辑
After the debate between Vance and Waltz, I think that many voters will vote for Trump because of Vance, and many voters will give up supporting Kamala because of Waltz.
Vance completed Trump, his speech and academic.
Waltz is similar to Kamala and his speech is very empty. He even said he made friends with shooters, and he lied that he was with the students at Tiananmen Square massacre,in fact, he was not even at China!
Moreover, Waltz has ambiguous relations with foreign forces, chaotic private life, huge debts in Macau, and even early withdrawal of funds from 401k retirement accounts. Congress is investigating him, and I believe more details will be exposed in October.
Kamala, like Waltz, has made no accomplishments in life and has a bad political career. They just cling to the left-wing political system and become parasites of the big money (soros). The Democratic Party chose Waltz just to please the extreme Muslim forces. Minnesota, where Waltz is the governor, is full of Somali refugees, and the state flag has even been changed to the Somali style. The state's crime rate ranks among the highest in the United States, and the economic growth rate is only half of the national average. This completely exposed Waltz's lack of morality and incompetence, and also shattered the Democratic Party's lie that a large number of refugees and illegal immigrants can promote employment and the economy.
Today, voters are simply unwilling to listen to Kamala and Waltz's speech without depth. Kamala accepted a TV interview for the first time last week, but the ratings that night were only ranked 13th, because voters have long seen through her and Waltz's empty words, which are all memorized and repeated over and over again. In short, Waltz can't bring any advantages to Kamala.
In contrast, Vance is emotionally stable, reasonable, citing classics, with sufficient data, and full of academic style. No matter how difficult the left-wing reporters are, he responds calmly and behaves properly. He complements Trump's sharp edge and believes that he can win the favor of some suburban female voters. These women are often moral cleanliness patients who ignore the overall situation, but I believe that some of them will support Trump because of Vance's words and deeds. As for Waltz, I'm afraid no voters will support Kamala, who is equally immoral and incompetent, just because of his madness and incompetence. |
|