天涯小站 2.0

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 8216|回复: 4

[其他] Neanderthals -Cave Art Reveals the Neanderthal More Intelligent Than Believed

[复制链接]
发表于 2014-8-15 09:31:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 Neanderthal 于 2014-9-13 12:56 AM 编辑

This thread collects news, thoughts, and comments about the Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other members of the  Homo family.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-12 23:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Neanderthal 于 2014-9-13 12:35 AM 编辑

Cave Art Reveals the Neanderthal More Intelligent Than Believed
Neanderthal cave art discovered in Gibraltar has revealed a new side to the extinct human species, researchers believe. The cave art contradicts previous theories of Neanderthal intelligence, instead portraying them as more intellectually proficient and conceptual in their thinking. The criss-crossing lines were found to be very similar to abstract art created by modern humans.The report of the findings was announced on Sep. 1. The cave carving is believed to be the first discovery of Neanderthal art, though previous art has been linked to the Neanderthals. Currently the matter is in dispute, but the Gibraltar cave art is the first undisputed discovery.In the media, the Neanderthal has been cast as a cave man, a half-man, half-apish creature lacking in critical thinking skills and general smarts, and possessing only a rudimentary ability to make tools. The research, however ,suggests that they were instead in possession of a culture and way of life remarkably similar to that of modern humans. They had families, buried their dead and wore clothing and colorful pigments. The new Neanderthal art now reveals a potentially more in-depth side of their culture, abilities, and awareness of the world around them.What is believed to be a cross-hatching pattern was represented in the eight lines used in the carving–cross-hatching being a technique taught in art schools as one of the foundations of art. Utilized to create shading and depth, cross-hatching creates an illusion of light and shadow in an art piece, providing it with a feeling of density and “realness.” The carving is too deliberate in its style for it to have been carved by accident, as it would have required a conscious effort with a tool as well as some time to etch into the cave wall.The presence of cross-hatching is a sign that the Neanderthal people had an advanced understanding of art, comprehending it at a higher level than mere childish scribbles or simple recreations of the physical world around them. The discovery of the cave art reveals more evidence of Neanderthals as advanced humans. “[T]he ability for abstract thought was not exclusive” to modern man, reports Clive Finlayson, an anthropologist and director of the Gibraltar Museum, along with fellow colleagues.The new reveal follows another recent discovery of Neanderthal life in Italy, where researchers unearthed Neanderthal homes and found them surprisingly similar to the homes of modern-day man. According to the study, Neanderthal man strategically placed their fires for maximum dispersal of warmth, separated their sleeping places from other spaces in the home, and had an area specifically for the preparation of animal carcasses that wouldn’t affect other parts of the cave.The discovery of the cave art will likely change beliefs drastically in the future concerning Neanderthal studies. According to Riel-Salvatore, who has a Ph.D in archaeology, people “tend to have this idea of Neanderthals as these stereotypical cavemen,” he said. He contended that the more researchers learn about Neanderthals, the fewer known differences there will be between these bygone humans and modern-day man.By Jillian M. MoyetSources:Guardian Liberty VoiceCBC News -Cave ArtCBC News – Neanderthal HomesUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of Delaware
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-8-17 03:34:23 | 显示全部楼层
觉得外星人更有可能。你的老祖宗家谱里没提这事?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-12 23:40:55 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Neanderthal 于 2014-9-13 12:44 AM 编辑


Was Neanderthal shot by a time traveller? 



ONE day in 1922, near Broken Hill, Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), a skull was found. When it came to the attention of the British Museum, the curators were pleased.It was, in fact, a Neanderthal skull, and Neanderthal bones did not exactly come ten-a-penny.But the Broken Hill skull was special for other reasons. On the left side of the cranium was a small, perfectly round hole. At first it was assumed that it had been made by a spear, or other sharp implement, but further investigation proved that this had not been the case.When a skull is struck by a relatively low-velocity projectile – such as an arrow, or spear – it produces what are known as radial cracks or striations; that is, minute hairline fractures running away from the place of impact.As there were no radial fractures on the Neanderthal skull, it was unanimously concluded that the projectile must have had a far, far greater velocity than an arrow or spear. But what?Another mystery was that the right side of the cranium had, in the words of one anthropologist, “been blown away”. Further research also proved that that the right side of the cranium had been “blown away” from the inside out.In short, whatever had hit the Broken Hill Neanderthal on the left side of his head had passed through it with such force that it had caused the right side to explode.Researcher Rene Noorbergen, who investigated the mystery in his excellent book Secrets Of The Lost Races, commented: “This same feature is seen in modern victims of head wounds received from shots from a high-powered rifle.”Noorbergen’s comments were more than appropriate, for forensic experts who have studied the skull in Berlin have since concluded that, “The cranial damage to Rhodesian Man’s skull could not have been caused by anything but a bullet”.Compounding the mystery further is the fact that the skull of an ancient aurochs (an extinct type of bison) was found in Russia by the Lena River.It, too, had been shot in the head, thousands of years previously, but had survived for some time, as the bullet hole had calcified.This sensational discovery came to the attention of professor Constantin Flerov, curator of Moscow’s Palaeontological Museum of the USSR, who promptly put the skull on display.Incredible though it sounds, we are faced with quite forceful evidence that, thousands of years ago, someone discharged a bullet into the skull of one of our anthropological cousins and also nearly killed a large mammal by the same method. But how could this be?One obvious (but very radical) solution is to conclude that, contrary to what we have always understood, ancient man may have been technologically developed to a very high degree. Did a small but advanced civilisation develop the concept of ballistics long before the Chinese?The problem with this idea is that it is too much of a coincidence. Could two separate societies, separated by thousands of years and a vast cultural gulf, have both invented weapons that just happened to fire small, cylindrical projectiles at high speed?One colleague suggested to me that the only alternative is the possibility that someone from the future, carrying a firearm, travelled back into the past and engaged in some sort of trans-temporal hunting expedition.This takes us perilously close to the realms of science fantasy, of course, but the fact is that the hole in the aurochs’ skull got there somehow.Like it or not, the fact is that someone or something seemed to be using high-velocity bullets thousands of years ago. We don’t know who, we don’t know why and we don’t know how – but it happened.http://www.shieldsgazette.com/op ... traveller-1-6786186b]Was Neanderthal shot by a time traveller?


回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2014-12-20 23:50:49 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Neanderthal 于 2014-12-21 12:48 AM 编辑

BBC Planet of the Apemen Battle for Earth 1of2 Homo Erectus




BBC Planet of the Apemen Battle for Earth 2of2 Neanderthal



回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|天涯小站

GMT-5, 2026-6-30 11:51 PM

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表